Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard de Crespigny

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect to Qantas Flight 32. Michig (talk) 15:36, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Richard de Crespigny

Richard de Crespigny (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BIO1E CorrectKissinTime (talk) 15:25, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:09, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:09, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:09, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

• Redirect to Qantas Flight 32, the WP:ONEEVENT for which he is known. Clarityfiend (talk) 22:32, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
• Delete Not only does it lack any clear claim to significant notability, it is written in horribly uneven style.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:48, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
• Redirect per Clarityfiend. de Crespigny is mildly well-known, but only in the context of this air accident. Nick-D (talk) 23:28, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
• Redirect to Qantas Flight 32. De Crespigny also wrote a book about the same event that was modestly successful, but not enough that I think he'd meet WP:AUTHOR. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 07:59, 27 July 2014 (UTC).

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.