Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Bridgeland
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. John254 00:15, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- John Bridgeland (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable under WP:BIO. Likely to be a case of WP:COI as the top 3 contributors have only edited this article or other articles strictly related to the person. Piccolo Modificatore Laborioso (talk) 22:19, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep and close. A simple news search clearly indicates the person's notability. There are also sufficient references in the article itself to prove the notability. Concerns about COI and/or POV are not to be taken to AfD. LeaveSleaves talk 17:35, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The Washington Post and the US President thought this person was notable. If they think so you'll have to come with some extraordinary to the contrary. COI is not a valid reason for deletion. - Mgm|(talk) 18:35, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Flies way over the notability bar. There seems to be an idea amongst some editors that deletion is the solution to every problem. It is not. Where a subject is notable, and there is at least some information in an article worth salvaging, the answer to COI editing is for other editors to review the article for any content that doesn't present a neutral point of view, and edit accordingly, not to delete the whole article. Phil Bridger (talk) 19:24, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.